The value of error, Nietzsche.
The value of error, Nietzsche.
Why do we think 'truth' is more valuable than 'error' or 'imaginary', and 'established' more valuable than 'indeterminate'?
For living things, grasping what is true and what is certain is an important survival condition. However, when it comes to the preservation and strengthening of life, 'error' is as precious as 'truth'. This is a unique feature of Nietzsche's philosophy. Nietzsche teaches the value of error as much as the value of truth.
Nietzsche says that pointing out the 'error of judgment' does not constitute a 'objection against judgment'. Even if a certain judgment was 'error', it means that it is not a worthless judgment. Rather, as far as survival is concerned, we are benefiting from error.
In order to accept 'identity', the most basic of logic, we need eyes that 'roughly' see things, since not a single particle of dust is the same in the world. For example, when we roughly omit the differences between people, we can group them all together and say 'human'. That is why we see the forest. You have to look at the trees and cross over to see the forest. It is also a matter of survival. If there is a species that recognizes the 'dead and alive mushroom' and 'same kind' mushroom that it ate yesterday and the 'different' mushroom, their chances of survival will be low. In other words, a race that strictly interprets identity and difference is difficult to survive. Therefore, 'logical animals' can survive through 'irrationality' to some extent, and 'logical' presupposes 'irrational' to some extent.
Nietzsche says the same applies to the concepts of 'force', 'object', 'cause and effect', and 'motion and rest', which are the means by which we perceive the world. The concepts themselves are all unprovable, but we cannot live without them. In other words, such concepts are the conditions of our life. We perceive the world through them and live based on that perception.
The 'truth' itself can be "the kind of folly we need to preserve ourselves...". Nietzsche says that if you understand the saying that life requires error and folly, and that "there are errors in the conditions of life," then you can stand 'beyond good and evil' by that alone, Nietzsche says.
“To give up wrong judgment is to give up life, to deny life. To use untruth as a condition of life. Of course, this is a dangerous way of resisting habitual values. Philosophy by itself already stands on the other side of good and evil."
Comments
Post a Comment