Am I the master of life?

 Am I the master of life? 

"I think. Therefore I exist." - Descartes

"People tend to stick to the consciousness they have once formed." - Spinoza


Did everyone have their own thoughts?


Have you chosen your own thoughts?


It may seem like a complex and esoteric question, but the answer the board can give is simple.


Each thought did not create it for themselves, nor did it create it. I have only selected very few.


Why do we persist in living with thoughts that are merely memorized or implanted, regardless of our will?



How did my thoughts become my thoughts?



People fill their world of thought through the process of socialization.


Human beings are social beings, so they have a variety of relationships.


Parents, schools, teachers, friends, media, books... All these are processes of socialization.


These socialization processes of reading and learning unilaterally do not ask individual thoughts.


Maybe it means that you don't want to be the subject of your thoughts.


You need to be able to ask yourself the question, why do you constantly memorize while you are making up your own thoughts through various questions.


You need to be able to think about why you are completely failing to open your eyes to humans and society.


“We are all in prison. How limited is what we see and how we hear with our ears. And how long will we live at most? So we are living in prison. But this prison has one amazing window. . Through this window, you can meet all the worlds. It is the window called the book."


The only object we can refer to when trying to shape our thoughts is people. Because only people think like people...


If reading refers to the thoughts of those who have lived and left the book, discussion refers to the thoughts of those living with me now. The thoughts formed in the world of consciousness through the combination of the experiences that one has seen, experienced and felt, and the discussion of a wide reading and open attitude.


When each stubborn thought is created through this process, it can be said that it becomes the subject of thought and the master of life.


The thoughts and conservatism of members of Korean society are mere results. The problem is non-subjectivity.


I hope you don't fall into this empty life where you stick to it even though you are not the owner of your thoughts...


We must be masters of our lives, and in order to do that, we must be masters of our thoughts.


Am I truly the master of my life?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fatigue society, excess of positivity, dialectic of positivity.

 Fatigue society, excess of positivity, dialectic of positivity. ​ ​ ​ Each age has its own disease. For example, there is an era that can be said to be bacterial. But this era came to an end, at least with the invention of antibiotics. The beginning of the 21st century can be defined pathologically as neither bacterial nor viral, but rather neurotic. It is an infarct disease, not a contagious disease, and it is a disease caused by an excess of positivity, not the negativity of the immunological other. Therefore, it is by no means governed by immunological techniques aimed at defeating the negativity of others. ​ The last century was the immunological age. In other words, it was an era in which clear boundaries were drawn between the inside and the outside, friends and enemies, and me and others. The essence of immunological behavior is aggression and defense. There is a certain blindness in the essence of these immunological devices that have taken over the entire society from the...
Read more

The Truth of Perspectiveism, Maturana.

 The Truth of Perspectiveism, Maturana. "The observer is the source of all things. Without the observer nothing exists. The observer is the basis of all knowledge. The basis of all claims concerning man himself, the world and the universe. The extinction of the observer is the It will mean an end and annihilation, for there will be no one left to perceive, speak, describe or explain." - <<From Being to Doing>> Maturana ​ Someone is watching something. Marurana says this is a fundamental starting point. The person develops a world of his own as he sees it as an observer. If the other person exists as an observer, then the other person's world exists, and as an observer, the world that that person sees also exists. ​ The philosopher Nietzsche, before Maturana, described this as perspectives. If the term perspectives is difficult to describe, you can borrow the term from Maturana and call it 'observers. ​ ​ Snakes are creatures of a different world from human...
Read more

active reading.

 active reading. We know more about the world than we used to, and you may still think that knowledge is essential to understanding something. But knowledge is no longer as essential for understanding as one-sided thinking. You don't have to 'know' everything about something to 'understand' it. Too much information can actually be an obstacle to understanding something. The present age is overflowing with facts that prevent us from understanding the correct appearance of things due to a lot of information. ​ One of the most active projects of some of the best intellectuals today is to unite views from an intellectual standpoint. Through the Internet, television, radio, and magazines, people are provided with well-organized resources, from clever persuasion to carefully curated information and statistics, to make 'decisions' with little effort. But with effective packaging, viewers, listeners, and readers are sometimes unable to make their own decisions. As i...
Read more