Science vs nature...

 Science vs. nature.


The rocket soared. Everyone opened their mouths. It was only the naive "ah" sound that was uttered in surprise, that vague and primitive sound.


The symbolic meaning of the launch can be read in several ways.


Spirit, Yahweh, the Holy Trinity, the incarnation of Marwari, was also the almighty creator of the universe.


Moments of smoke and fire that the Old Testament prophets offered to make their audience tremble before the majesty of the gods came to mind. However, the appearance of the modern god was created by the most secular and pagan machines.


Science has taught us to look down on the gods.


​


The sky was covered with stars incredibly dense. It looked like lots of glitters had been sprinkled on the black satin hem. For thousands of years, nature, and beings believed to be its creators, have monopolized awe. When we look at things like icebergs, deserts, volcanoes, and glaciers, we realize that we have an end and a limit. At that moment, fear and respect merge into one, and at the same time, the heart becomes humble and strangely happy. It is famous that this feeling was called 'sublime' by philosophers of the 18th century.


​


During the nineteenth century, nature was withdrawn from its position as the main catalyst for the sublime feeling.


We have now entered the age of the technological sublime. This is an era in which supercomputers, rockets, and particle accelerators are the most awe-inspiring. We are now almost surprised only by ourselves.


​


Nature is an object of concern and sympathy.


We are hurt by our Don Quixote power.


We felt respect for science and compassion and guilt for the glacier.


​


What are you relying on and admiring?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fatigue society, excess of positivity, dialectic of positivity.

 Fatigue society, excess of positivity, dialectic of positivity. ​ ​ ​ Each age has its own disease. For example, there is an era that can be said to be bacterial. But this era came to an end, at least with the invention of antibiotics. The beginning of the 21st century can be defined pathologically as neither bacterial nor viral, but rather neurotic. It is an infarct disease, not a contagious disease, and it is a disease caused by an excess of positivity, not the negativity of the immunological other. Therefore, it is by no means governed by immunological techniques aimed at defeating the negativity of others. ​ The last century was the immunological age. In other words, it was an era in which clear boundaries were drawn between the inside and the outside, friends and enemies, and me and others. The essence of immunological behavior is aggression and defense. There is a certain blindness in the essence of these immunological devices that have taken over the entire society from the...
Read more

The Truth of Perspectiveism, Maturana.

 The Truth of Perspectiveism, Maturana. "The observer is the source of all things. Without the observer nothing exists. The observer is the basis of all knowledge. The basis of all claims concerning man himself, the world and the universe. The extinction of the observer is the It will mean an end and annihilation, for there will be no one left to perceive, speak, describe or explain." - <<From Being to Doing>> Maturana ​ Someone is watching something. Marurana says this is a fundamental starting point. The person develops a world of his own as he sees it as an observer. If the other person exists as an observer, then the other person's world exists, and as an observer, the world that that person sees also exists. ​ The philosopher Nietzsche, before Maturana, described this as perspectives. If the term perspectives is difficult to describe, you can borrow the term from Maturana and call it 'observers. ​ ​ Snakes are creatures of a different world from human...
Read more

active reading.

 active reading. We know more about the world than we used to, and you may still think that knowledge is essential to understanding something. But knowledge is no longer as essential for understanding as one-sided thinking. You don't have to 'know' everything about something to 'understand' it. Too much information can actually be an obstacle to understanding something. The present age is overflowing with facts that prevent us from understanding the correct appearance of things due to a lot of information. ​ One of the most active projects of some of the best intellectuals today is to unite views from an intellectual standpoint. Through the Internet, television, radio, and magazines, people are provided with well-organized resources, from clever persuasion to carefully curated information and statistics, to make 'decisions' with little effort. But with effective packaging, viewers, listeners, and readers are sometimes unable to make their own decisions. As i...
Read more